Connect with us

News

All Protocol(s) Observed By Reuben Abati

Published

on

Nigerians love events and ceremonies. The engine of governance in fact runs on this special fuel, which in many ways has become an occasional excuse for waste and idleness. I have in the course of work attended and compered many of such events; one thing that I find curious is the obsession with acknowledgements. If you are the compere at any typical Nigerian event, the organizers are bound to give you what they call a protocol list, usually a long list of persons whose presence must be acknowledged. You are also expected to recognize persons, especially if they are government officials, according to an established ranking order.

This means you can’t recognize a Member of a State House of Assembly before a Member of the House of Representatives, and you can’t “acknowledge the presence (as it were) of” a Minister before a Senator. Any slight mix up is likely to fetch you a reprimand and complaints about how you are such an insensitive compere who wants to ruin an event that had been so well planned. Getting the pecking social order right is not even enough, you must be politically correct when you deploy such egoistic phrases as Your Excellency, The Distinguished, The Most Honourable, Your Honour, Your Worship, My Lord, Your Grace, Your Eminence…Only God knows what these honorifics do to the Nigerian big man or big woman’s mind. When you get it right, you can see the person actually believing the myth about he or she being so excellent, distinguished or honourable. Some would even rise and wave to the crowd.

The institutionalized flattery involved, is of course not limited to the special guests, sorry special guests of honour (!) who occupy the high table, or the top table, or better still, the reserved table. Other guests also have to be introduced. The rule is never to overlook any important person. If it is a government or corporate event, nearly everybody is important. If certain persons are mistakenly overlooked, they would insist on sending their personal assistants to the compere to remind him or her of how a grave error has been committed. Some would send their business cards, or a note or summon the compere to their table to register not a complaint but a protest!

Indeed, being a master of ceremony at a Nigerian event could be the ultimate test of humility and human patience. I once introduced a certain VIP as Chief XYZ. I was summoned and reprimanded. “He is not a Chief, but a High Chief”, he said. Correction taken, apology offered. “It is now my pleasure to introduce once more High Chief XYZ, the whatever 1 of anywhere.” The man grinned cheerfully. His retinue of assistants applauded so loudly, you would think the event was all about him. There certainly must be something special about being a High Chief; ordinary Chiefs, I guess, must be less human. But consider this: on another occasion, I mistakenly referred to another VIP as a Chief. The man sent for me, and whispered into my ears: “next time you call me a Chief, I’ll sue you, only unserious people go about saying they are Chief this and Chief that. I have never taken a chieftaincy title in my life; I am simply Mister. You understand? ” Yes, sir!

Again, apologies tendered. I went back to the microphone to introduce the Mister properly, cleverly leaving out his anti-chieftaincy commentary. But how do you deal with royalty? Now that many Nigerians act and behave like Republicans, traditional rulers and the royalty have also learnt to leave the comfort of their palaces to hustle like other Nigerians on the streets, and so, you can’t miss royal presence at most events. But there is a challenge, acknowledging them. You have to know who is His Royal Highness or which traditional ruler is better addressed as His Royal Majesty.

To play safe, it is always advisable to refer to every traditional ruler as His Royal Majesty. It doesn’t matter if the man is a common village head. The word “Royal” is where the magic lies. Leave it out, and you’d have palace jesters rushing to you to insist you emphasize that special phrase. To get the protocol right, the titles of female guests of honour must also be properly mentioned, the problem is knowing who is what: Yeye, Erelu, Lolo, Alhaja, Hajia, Dame, Mrs, Miss or Ms. And there is at least one female VIP who objects to any young compere mentioning her first name: she says that is rude! “I am old enough to be your mum, and you know my dear, we are Africans!” Etiquette lesson taken: “Sorry Ma.” Not to talk of the Igwes. the Knights of numerous Saints, the Otunbas and holders of honorary degrees who insist on being addressed as “Dr.”

By the time a Nigerian compere struggles with these imposed standards, half of the time is wasted on absolutely unimportant niceties. And wait a minute, most of the guests would arrive late anyway and insist on being seated close to the high table, at a visible location, preferably in full view of the television cameras. Important guests like to be noticed; they want to appear on television and have their photographs taken by photojournalists who criss-cross the floor, blocking people’s view, blinding guests with camera flashes, thus constituting extra nuisance.

But the real notice-me tactic often adopted is when in the middle of a programme or a speech, some really self-important guest arrives noisily and holds everything up, making a song and a dance, sashaying across the hall. The compere is expected to suspend the programme and massage the ego of the latecomer: “Announcing the arrival of….” I imagine it is precisely because of this elevation of bad conduct into a side event, that nobody is allowed to arrive late at any event where the President of Nigeria is already seated. The security people will not allow such breach of protocol. And if anyone at all must be allowed in, he or she would have to sneak in quietly and no official compere would dare announce such rude arrival. That is another delicate protocol matter, though.

Then, the speeches: no event is complete without speeches and do Nigerians love to make speeches? Oh yes. Most of the time, many of the speeches are unnecessary. Those who are not supposed to say a word are invited to say a few words and they take an hour. There is so much repetition, with some speakers not having enough sense to leave out what has already been said. You are also likely to find someone who starts with “I don’t have much to say” only to go ahead and bore you silly. Or, some would start with: “I’ll try to be brief.” When you hear this, it’s better to be on your guard. Be prepared to listen to a rambling sermon. Even when time is allotted for every speech, this is usually ignored. I have been at events where the microphone was deliberately muted when the speaker started wasting time. Some speakers would still insist that they should be allowed to finish whatever they believe they are saying and they’d go on rudely, without the microphone!

Then, the acknowledgements: Every speaker begins with a long list of acknowledgements: Your Excellency, the President of the world, Your Excellency the Governor of this, Your Excellency the Governor of that… (if ten or twenty governors are in attendance, some speakers will mention each one of them by name!), and the Distinguished Senator whatever, The Right Honourable somebody, My Lords, spiritual and temporal….this alone may go on for close to five minutes. Before then, the compere would also have taken about five minutes giving the biography of the speaker. And he does that with every speaker, who again takes the microphone and repeats the same protocol list, only to end it all with “All protocol(s) observed.” Sometimes, all protocols are not just observed but “duly observed”, followed by the ritual of time-wasting salutations.

And in some cases, the protocols are “respectfully and fully observed.” The truth is that speakers don’t have to worry about protocol being “duly, respectfully or fully” observed. Career diplomats often protest that these phrases are incorrect and offensive. But this has not stopped speaker after speaker adopting similar short cuts: “Madam Chairperson, permit me to stand on existing protocols”. Or: “Ladies and Gentlemen, allow me to adopt existing protocols.” On one occasion, a speaker said: “I am sitting on existing protocols, Mr. Chairman.” That was something novel except that it didn’t stop the next speaker from standing on the same protocols that someone had just sat upon.

Elsewhere, in Britain, United States, Canada, and Europe, when speeches are to be made, people don’t sit or stand on protocols and there are no long introductions and acknowledgements. The speeches are delivered in a pre-arranged order, promptly, briefly and to the point. And of course, the guests arrive on time. Prefacing a speech with “Ladies and Gentlemen” is considered adequate. Here and in other African countries: Kenya, South Africa, Uganda, Namibia, Ghana…the reverse is usually the case. We should perhaps begin to worry about African protocol, very much like African Time (!). Our public events and ceremonies could become more purposeful and business-like, however, if we dispense with lengthy introductions of titles and biographies. I once embarked on the onerous task of measuring the time spent on protocol at a particular event: two full hours. The main business of the day – an award ceremony – was just a little under an hour!

rru
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

MAN Urges Federal Government to Stop NAFDAC’s Sachet Alcohol Ban, Warns of ₦1.9 Trillion Loss

Published

on

The Manufacturers Association of Nigeria has appealed to the Federal Government to restrain the National Agency for Food and Drug Administration and Control from proceeding with its ban on alcoholic beverages packaged in sachets and small PET bottles, warning of catastrophic economic consequences.

In a statement issued by Director-General Segun Ajayi-Kadir, MAN described NAFDAC’s renewed enforcement action as detrimental to indigenous industrial operators and fundamentally inconsistent with earlier government directives.

The manufacturers’ body emphasized that NAFDAC’s recent move directly contradicts the House of Representatives resolution dated March 14, 2024, which specifically restrained the agency from implementing the punitive ban following comprehensive stakeholder consultations through a public hearing.

“Rather than abiding by the generally agreed resolution, NAFDAC bided its time and chose to rely on a resolution of the Senate that was devoid of the usual stakeholders’ engagement,” Ajayi-Kadir stated, noting that operators now face confusion over conflicting directives from different arms of government.

MAN warned that enforcing the ban would devastate Nigeria’s manufacturing sector, threatening over ₦1.9 trillion in existing investments and triggering the retrenchment of more than 500,000 direct employees alongside approximately five million workers in the indirect value chain.

The association cautioned that the restriction would paradoxically undermine public health by creating market opportunities for illicit, substandard and unregulated products beyond the control of regulatory authorities.

“This is counterproductive as it will open up the market for illicit, sub-standard, and unregulated products. It will lead to an influx of imported alternatives, mostly smuggled. It will deny the government of revenues collectable from the companies,” Ajayi-Kadir declared.

The manufacturers’ group emphasized that alcohol served in sachets by local producers is manufactured under hygienic conditions and certified by regulatory agencies including NAFDAC itself, making the ban particularly contradictory.

MAN also challenged the untested assertion that sachet alcohol drives underage consumption, citing credible and empirical research that contradicts this claim. The industry has independently invested over ₦1 billion in nationwide media campaigns promoting responsible alcohol consumption and discouraging underage abuse.

The association stressed that banning certified products would deny adult consumers with limited budgets access to regulated alcoholic beverages while simultaneously depriving the government of substantial tax revenues.

Food, Beverages and Tobacco Senior Staff Association and National Union of Food, Beverages and Tobacco Employees have joined MAN in opposing the ban, demanding that NAFDAC provide empirical evidence that sachet alcoholic beverages are being consumed by children.

Labor unions have called for the suspension of NAFDAC Director-General Professor Mojisola Adeyeye, accusing her of siding with multinational companies to undermine local manufacturers.

However, NAFDAC has maintained its position, with Adeyeye insisting that enforcement is backed by law following the Senate’s unanimous resolution setting a December 2025 deadline that has now passed.

The NAFDAC chief argued that the proliferation of high-alcohol-content beverages in sachets has made such products easily accessible, affordable and concealable, contributing to widespread misuse and addiction among minors and commercial drivers.

“This public health menace has been linked to increased incidences of domestic violence, road accidents, school dropouts, and social vices across communities,” Adeyeye stated, describing the ban as protective rather than punitive.

In contrast, civil society organization Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project has approached the Federal High Court in Lagos seeking injunctive orders to prevent the Federal Government from interfering with NAFDAC’s statutory powers to enforce the ban.

SERAP argues that continued circulation of sachet alcohol violates the National Health Act 2014, the NAFDAC Act and international commitments under the World Health Organization’s Global Strategy to Reduce Harmful Use of Alcohol.

The legal and economic battle over sachet alcohol highlights deeper tensions between public health regulation, economic survival and stakeholder consultation in Nigeria’s policymaking process, with no clear resolution in sight as multiple court cases and regulatory actions unfold simultaneously.

Continue Reading

News

Shettima: Tinubu’s Reforms Rebuilding Nigeria’s Global Credibility, Restoring International Confidence

Published

on

Vice President Kashim Shettima has declared that President Bola Tinubu’s economic reforms are successfully rebuilding Nigeria’s international reputation and restoring global investor confidence that had eroded over years of policy inconsistency.

Speaking at the formal opening of Nigeria House during the 2026 World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, Shettima emphasized that the establishment of the country’s first sovereign pavilion at the prestigious gathering represents concrete evidence of Nigeria’s renewed seriousness about engaging the global economy.

“Nigeria House is a response to the lapses of the past. It reflects our intention, our seriousness, and above all, it advertises both our readiness and our resolve to take a front-line seat in the discourse of the global economy, not as observers, but as participants with a clear sense of purpose and place,” the Vice President stated.

Shettima explained that the tangible benefits of the Tinubu administration’s challenging but necessary reforms are beginning to materialize, pointing to macroeconomic indicators that demonstrate fundamental improvement in Nigeria’s economic trajectory.

According to the Vice President, Nigeria’s economy expanded by approximately 3.9 percent in 2025, marking the fastest growth rate recorded in over a decade, driven primarily by a resilient non-oil sector that now accounts for roughly 96 percent of gross domestic product.

“Services, agriculture, finance, and technology are expanding, while non-oil revenues now make up nearly three-quarters of government collections, marking a structural shift away from oil dependence,” Shettima noted, adding that this diversification strategy positions Nigeria for sustainable long-term prosperity.

The Vice President revealed that inflation, which stood above 30 percent in late 2024, eased significantly by the conclusion of 2025, while external buffers improved with foreign reserves rising above 45 billion dollars and greater stability emerging in the foreign exchange market.

He emphasized that Nigeria’s decision to open up to the world more deliberately comes at a critical turning point in the country’s economic journey, with reform dividends becoming increasingly visible across multiple sectors.

Minister of Industry, Trade and Investment Dr. Jumoke Oduwole reinforced Shettima’s assessment, stating that Nigeria under the current administration is rebuilding trust, restoring credibility and positioning itself as a global center for wealth creation and strategic partnership.

The minister applauded the Vice President’s support in realizing the historic vision for Nigeria House Davos, describing the project as a demonstration of strong public-private partnership that reflects the rejuvenation of Nigeria’s economy and showcases national pride.

At a separate engagement, Shettima told participants at a high-level panel discussion titled “When Food Becomes Security” that Nigeria, renowned as the African giant, has awakened from its slumber under Tinubu’s dynamic and purposeful leadership.

The Vice President expressed optimism that with ongoing Renewed Hope Agenda reforms, the coming months will witness greater climate adaptation moving from pilot projects to reality, as well as a boom in intra-African trade far beyond the current 10.7 percent baseline.

Speaking at the inaugural convocation ceremony of the Professionals’ Certification Programme at the Presidential Villa in Abuja, Shettima revealed that foreigners now choose to participate in professional training courses in Nigeria, citing this trend as evidence that global confidence in the country is being restored.

“The ongoing reforms of President Tinubu’s administration are beginning to restore the confidence of the global community in Nigeria,” the Vice President stated, emphasizing that transparent procurement practices and institutional strengthening form critical pillars of the reform agenda.

Nigeria House Davos, according to Shettima, represents a deliberate action to consolidate the gains of Tinubu’s economic transformation efforts through high-level engagements targeted at attracting investments in the country’s non-oil sector.

The Vice President stressed that while government can open doors, create frameworks and de-risk environments, only private enterprise can animate growth, scale opportunity and translate policy into productivity, calling on the private sector to drive Nigeria’s economic renaissance.

Upon returning to Abuja from his week-long diplomatic and economic mission that included stops in Guinea-Conakry and Switzerland, Shettima declared that Nigeria has reclaimed a frontline seat in global and regional policy conversations.

Continue Reading

News

“I Can Decide To Revoke The Land Allocated To Onitsha Main Market And Build A School On It” — Gov Soludo

Published

on

Anambra State Governor, Professor Chukwuma Charles Soludo, has sparked fresh controversy after stating that he has the constitutional power to revoke the land allocated to Onitsha Main Market and repurpose it for public use, including building a school. The governor made the remark while addressing market leaders amid the ongoing dispute over the continued Monday sit-at-home observed by traders in the state.
Soludo recently ordered the closure of Onitsha Main Market for one week after traders allegedly complied with sit-at-home directives despite the state government’s ban on such actions. He described the practice as “economic sabotage” and warned that the government would no longer tolerate disruptions to commercial activities in Anambra, one of Nigeria’s major economic hubs.
According to the governor, the Land Use Act empowers the state to revoke land allocations for overriding public interest, adding that affected owners would be compensated and could challenge the compensation in court if dissatisfied. He further warned that shops that remain closed could be sealed, fined, or taken over by the government and reassigned to willing traders.
The decision has generated mixed reactions, with critics accusing the government of punishing ordinary traders and worsening economic hardship, while supporters argue that enforcing a full business week is necessary to restore economic stability and investor confidence in the state. Some lawmakers and stakeholders have also urged the governor to adopt dialogue and caution, citing potential losses and unrest from prolonged market closures.
As tensions continue, the development highlights the broader struggle between government authority, security concerns, and economic survival in the South-East, with Onitsha Main Market—one of West Africa’s largest commercial centres—at the centre of the storm.

Continue Reading

Trending